翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ United States v. Hatter
・ United States v. Hayes
・ United States v. Heirs of De Haro
・ United States v. Holmes
・ United States v. Hooe
・ United States v. Hubbard
・ United States v. Hubbell
・ United States v. Hudson
・ United States v. Imperial Petroleum, Inc.
・ United States v. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad Co.
・ United States v. International Boxing Club of New York, Inc.
・ United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission
・ United States v. Ivanov
・ United States v. Jackalow
・ United States v. Jackson
United States v. Janis
・ United States v. Jawad
・ United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation
・ United States v. John
・ United States v. John (1978)
・ United States v. John (2010)
・ United States v. Johns
・ United States v. Johnson
・ United States v. Johnson (1863)
・ United States v. Johnson (1899)
・ United States v. Johnson (1911)
・ United States v. Johnson (1944)
・ United States v. Johnson (1946)
・ United States v. Johnson (1966)
・ United States v. Johnson (1968)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

United States v. Janis : ウィキペディア英語版
United States v. Janis

''United States v. Janis'', (1976) was a Supreme Court Case that found Max Janis and Morris Levine guilty of illegal bookmaking activities in Los Angeles in a 5-3 ruling. The two were arrested for the crime in November 1968. Appealing on the grounds of unconstitutionally seized evidence, Janis and Levine were heard by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in 1973. The case was ultimately heard by the Supreme Court in 1975, and the two were found guilty in 1976. More importantly, the case established that the exclusionary rule does not apply to civil cases where evidence is unconstitutionally seized by a state officer but used by a federal institution.
==Background==
In Los Angeles in 1968, Officer Leonard Weissman of the Los Angeles Police Department obtained a warrant authorizing the search for bookmaking paraphernalia in two apartments in the city. These apartments respectively belonged to Morris Levine and Max Janis. Officer Weissman had been conducting surveillance on the two men from September 14 through November 30 of 1968, during which time he suspected the two of illegal bookmaking.〔
Upon the search, the officer confiscated $4,940 in cash, bookmaking records, and arrested the two men. The bookmaking records seized were a five-day sample of the men’s income from the business. He later contacted a revenue agent in the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to analyze these records.〔

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「United States v. Janis」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.